Відео

Mrs Rummell likes "adam's sound system" enthusiastic

between 2 ferns: supreme edition

29:00 Both have referenced our government as a democracy. Both are a disgrace to the constitution and the people.

We should expect this level of compassionate debate from our politicians and news agents today. Our pivot to celebrity and entertainment has taken the people away of seeking knowledge, understanding, and objective facts to guide decision to extremes of emotions, personal attacks and propaganda We need to demand our politicians, news hold this standard for our collective health and wellbeing as a society

Exposed Judges all statues de facto

The law of nations are nit you Ae The People CORPORATION city of lodon Crown

Pope Treasury vatican United States owns or think they do

totalitarians

Liers

Corporations can't make law Peter Kelly Congress

Only 500 odd comments for this video, compared to the millions that shitposting ideologues get.

The Constitution doesn’t adapt to people or their opinions.

Absolute, B.S.., from Scarlia...the man who was receiving free gifts and trips from billionaires across the country. I for one...have no respect for any Justice/ Lawyer's who are getting kick backs of any kind while in the service of the People! Period!! YOU'RE, A SERVANT OF THE PEOPLE... NOT YOUR PERSONAL GAINES. TODAY. ,IT CONTINUES WITH OTHERS LIKE.., THOMAS AND COMPANY! THE FINAL OPINION ON SCALIA..., IS THAT; THIS WAS ALSO THE INDOCTRINATED CATHOLIC WHO WAS PERSONALLY INFERRING HIS CRAZY RELIGIOUS BELIEFS THAT THE FOUNDING FATHER'S AND CONSTITUTION SUPPOSEDLY MENT! NOT! THE MAJORITY, WERE AGNOSTICS OR ATHEISTS! SO, ON THAT NOTE...GOOD RIDDENS TO THIS DUDE AND I DON'T FEEL BAD FOR HIS DOZENS OF KIDS HE LEFT BEHIND TO FURTHER HIS F..,UP BELIEFS AND RELIGION! HOPE YOU GOT YOUR SURPISE, THAT THERE'S NO HEVEN HERE PAL!😂

This is saddening to listen to those who are supposed to be the most intelligent amongst us and who have been put in positions of trust to not understand the foundational fundamental principles of American jurisprudence. We the People must do a better job instructing our trustees and servants.

Jim Jordan, Lauren Boebert, Chuck Grassley, Todd Cotton, MTG, Antonin Scalia.

Watch at 46:15 how Breyer reverts into bumbling buffoonish Professor mode after Scalia fucking crushes his arguments, and Scalia mercifully withdraws from totally destroying him

The moderator is absolutely fabulous. Interesting questions and totally respectful

Were we not guaranteed a republican form of government, now ?

2016. IPAD , legal UA-cam.

Antonin Scalia is the worse thing to have happened to the SCOTUS in modern times.

44:06 “nobody thought the bill of rights criminalized sodomy” well good thing lawrence was a 14A case, not a bill of rights case lmao

When prime minister is corrupt man Obviously Indian police Officeial Aldo Corrupt

Fascinating. The X-factor however to this conversation is integrity. Democracy is 99% integrity and 1% law.

Great content. Thanks for posting this. Justice Breyer's articulation of his framework around 17:00 was helpfully responded to by Scalia in critiquing his last two points right afterward around 19:00. The rejoinder was also helpful around 20:00.

The lamestream media, abc, cbs, nbc, cnbc, msnbc, etc.... would never air even a portion of this. Npr, national 'pubic' radio would air only the liberal (leftist) audio.

A man is fishing on a bank of a river. An observer asks "what are you fishing for? The fisherman answers "whatever will bite". Brewer is this particular fisherman. His answer "whatever" to the constitution......just as long as he gets to decide.....

Since I’ve been given the ability to share I shant pass it up at this juncture. However I feel it is important to mention that you can’t have a ruling class coexist w a national interest in the discovery channel and all actors and participles respectively- especially when humans are all capable of grave human error- an eye for an eye is not a meme for success…. I’ll add more later but for now let it be said when someone steals your honor and they’re wealthy and the institution makes a way for its ‘ruling class’ it’s tbc… waaaaaa 😭

Thank you China for your superb construction of such a great and finite work of art as this very iPhone- I’m struggling to keep up w your break-neck learning pace-when I’m able to get enough sleep and an adequate charge-together we are quite a apt team and that’s not just horse feathers 🪶 😅

21:00 judge discloses what he is doing

At 43:57 Scalia is complaining about how judges have found more expansive concepts of rights over time, and he says that no one thought the Bill of Rights gave a right to abortion, homosexuality, etc. This is a patently OBVIOUS legal error: those rights come from Substantive Due Process, a part of the 14th Amendment, which is a post-Civil War Amendment, not a founding era amendment. If Scalia is going to insist so hard that we MUST use history, and NOTHING ELSE, then he and other originalists could at the very least not mix up where we're supposed to be analyzing the history from. Originalist judges make this error all the time: They'll have a Due Process or Equal Protection question in front of them, and they'll start talking about the founding era, not the post-Civil War era, when the whole point of the 14th Amendment is that it expanded the nation's concept of rights to be far greater than what it was originally: many legal historians analogize the post-Civil War period as being like a second founding. This is something Scalia might understand if he had any actual understanding of History as a discipline. But nice that Scalia thinks that discarding our most important rights is a "piece of cake".

This is a foolish beginning! Attorneys take an oath to administer the law. They never own the law. Not even when they are judges. The problem is, this country is filled with SOCIALISM, not justice! Judges OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and get away with it! THE FREAKING US SUPREME COURT LET AMERICANS MASS MURDER AMERICANS ON SEPTEMBER 11! THEY WERE GETTING SO GOOD AT EVADING THEIR JOBS, THEY WENT FOR THE JUGULAR!

Scalia is right about amending the constitution or just simply allowing the states to handle it. States should decide on more things.

Scalia is right about amending the constitution or just simply allowing the states to handle it. States should decide on more things.

Man Breyer sucks so bad

59:45

At least it's not Australia, where you have no rights and where the high court often divides 3-2-2.

Scalia hides behind this notion of the legislature being responsible for substantive change, conveniently omitting that the legislature is in a crippled state due to partisanship, campaign finance-abuse and gerrymandering. If you consider this reality his philosophy reveals itself for what it is, rigid conservatism.

Morons leading the blind if the Federalists Society believes that these two Jurist, especially Scalia, best represent our Founding Fathers' idea for OUR country's Republic. Thomas Jefferson created the FOUNDATION for the perfect union. Jefferson had a plan that he believed would create world peace. How else do you warn future generations of the outcome of your agenda? To wit: Extract from Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia But is the spirit of the people an infallible, a permanent reliance? Is it government? Is this the kind of protection we receive in return for the rights we give up? Besides, the spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless. A single zealot may commence persecutor, and better men be his victims. It can never be too often repeated, that the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war we shall be going down hill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion. Hell, Jefferson even predicted Donald Trump.

Two great debaters!

so sad seeing all of them knowing that there's only one of them left are we getting old or what?

First, this moderator is serving up softballs to Scalia. It's important to note that she didn't question him on any of his opinions where he struggled so hard to hit a hard problem with a soft tool. Scalia wrote plenty of tortured opinions. That aside, Scalia was extremely intelligent. I think that it is because of his personality that originalism/textualism gained momentum. The problem is that the judges succeeding him, that are lesser than him in intelligence and work ethic, using tools that don't work for every problem, botch up the approach. Breyer is a great counter because he matches Scalia on intelligence and is very funny. On the bench he brings laughter to the room as much as Scalia did. The key is to understand how both of these men's theories are forwarded by the process of having to exchange their ideas. If you have a court thinking only one way, they don't have to write the best opinions or find compromises. Roberts has done that during a very divisive time. We have 9 justices for a reason. It was a thoughtful way to ensure that the journey to the decision was thorough and vetted by the best of the best.

I caught myself clapping at the end of this. Such an awesome conversation.

Scalia is a true master

12:39 "There are lots. There are lots. I'm just not prepared." There are none folks. And that tells you everything you need to know.

I have been doing assignments regarding this video over and over again. If your professsor has assigned an assignment on the same, kindly contact me.

Originalists diminished their own jurisprudence after Bush v Gore and then Citizens United. Completely. Also, Justices like Scalia and Thomas also placed a huge weight on religion, saying that the founding fathers intended to write the Constitution with religion in mind. Now, how many atheists were there in 18th century? The world didn't even know the facts on gravity and barely had any scientists who'd challenge religion and god's existence. So, there are so many flaws in their thinking that the theories they use contradict themselves. Again, Bush v Gore and Citizens United. Read it.

I am more aligned to Breyer's purposive interpretation rather than Scalia's originalism.

How did I go 18 years without knowing about Justice Scalia? This guy is so persuasive!

the supreme court continues to violate our constitutional rights

Interpreting the law is a very difficult issue, especially for Supreme Court justices. I'm more for Justice Scalia, he is better at elaborating his points. Sad he is not with us any more.